A lot has been made of Carrie Prejean's topless ("scandalous") photos, the breast implants that were paid for by the California Pageant Association, and, of course, her comments about gay marriage. There's been a lot of discussion about religious persecution, about intolerance, and a
lot of discussion about Christianity.
There was a comment made on Feministing's coverage of the controversy that I liked:
"Well, let's define Christianity. Christianity is the belief that Christ, the son of God, fulfilled God's law by sacrificing his life. And what is God's law? It is the Torah, or Pentateuch -- the first five books of the Bible, one of which you quote from. Much of the Torah, in fact most of it, deals with the practical law of day to day life 2,000 years ago -- which should bring in to focus why, yeah...it might not be a good idea to eat pork and circumcise a boy child.
So the banning of flesh from cloven-hoofed animals, eating scaled animals, sowing mixed seeds, weaving mixed fibers, the bathing rituals for menstruating women, hair length -- not required of Christians by definition of their faith. Following the Bible to a T? Jews do (have to). Christians don't (have to). Blunt, but that's the nutshell.
Even your own ignorance of what the Bible means to Christians undercuts a fabulous point that could be made from the "cherry picking" argument. There is not a lot said about homosexuality in the New Testament. So little is said, in fact, that defending homophobia from a Christian perspective is almost indefensible -- because the focus must, from a Christian perspective, be made from the New Testament and not the Old."
I may not be among the majority here - in fact, I know I'm not - but I really agree with this. I truly believe that a lot of the things fundamentalist Christians believe are wrong - and not only wrong, but I feel like God dislikes those beliefs. Being against an entire group of people, for example, is not really what God is for. And if He was, I wouldn't be Christian. Because I don't believe anyone should be persecuted for their beliefs. It doesn't matter what they believe.
Which is a lot of why there's been so much conversation about Miss California - she's challenging people's standards of things they can accept. If we approve of free speech, then necessarily we must accept her freedom to say things we disagree with. We also can't resort to slut-shaming - putting her down because she's been in topless photos or had breast implants - to discredit her arguments.
Read:
Feministing's article on slut-shaming Carrie Prejeanand the comments I liked most from that article:
here and
here